- The Editorial Board assesses the article for form and content.
- At least two independent reviewers are called to evaluate each publication. The reviewers must not be affiliated with the author's academic entity.
- The authors and the reviewers have no knowledge of their identity (double-blind review). In all other cases the reviewer signs a no-conflict-of-interest declaration.
- The review has written form and concludes with a clear statement of either acceptance or rejection of the publication.
- The criteria for the acceptance or rejection of the publication are available in the tab "Review Form".
- The statistics editor analyses and controls the article as to the correctness of the statistical methods applied by the authors.
- The Editorial Board emphasizes that ghostwriting or guest authorship are considered to be a manifestation of scientific misconduct and all the detected cases will be unmasked, including notification of the relevant actors (authors' associations, scientific and academic associations, editors' associations)
- The reviewing procedure complies with the recommendations of the Ministry of Higher Education and Science, included in: Dobre praktyki w procedurach recenzyjnych w nauce.